You might be surprised at what you find here. Many of America’s most polluted cities – those with billowing clouds of chemical emissions, toxic wastelands and thousands of commuting cars and trucks, those cities that earned our country the title of second largest polluter in the world – are also considered our greenest.

America’s Most Toxic Cities
A report released this fall by Forbes, Inc. listed the nation’s most toxic cities. Atlanta, Chicago and Philadelphia are cities with major chemical problems, and yet all are leaders in the green movement. Portland, Oregon comes in as the 10th most toxic city while simultaneously heading the SustainLane charts as America’s greenest city for two years running.
The rankings account for a metro area’s air quality, number of Brownfield sites and the amount of toxic chemicals released. Specifically, Forbes checked out the number of facilities releasing toxic chemicals into the air, water and earth, and the number of times the EPA has responded to an environmental incident or site in that city. Forbes also established an air quality ranking for each city based on the number of days per year that air pollution was above healthy levels.
Below are the 5 most toxic cities and what they’re doing to promote solar power and a greener city.
Atlanta (Sandy Springs, Marrieta) – Atlanta is not without its solar and green incentives. In addition to federal incentives, the state of Georgia reimburses homeowners for up to 35% (or $10,500) for home solar power. Atlanta’s principal electricity provider, Georgia Power, offers rebates for energy efficiency upgrades and Energy Star rated homes. Atlanta also has design standards in place that require all city and city-funded buildings to meet LEED Silver certification.
- Detroit (Livonia, Warren) – Detroit is no big surprise. The long-time home of the auto industry has a reputation for pollution. Recently, however, major strides have been taken in Michigan and Detroit to promote solar power and green building. In addition to Michigan’s renewable portfolio standard and state solar rebates, local utility Detroit Edison enacted a plan to attract 1,500 new solar installations. It involves a $2.40/watt rebate up to $48,000, and that’s in addition to state and federal incentives. Detroit has also embraced urban gardening and continually works to improve its public transit system, including buses and the People Mover light rail.
- Chicago (Naperville, Joliet) – Chicago is in the news a lot these days for its green-minded city government and citizenry. The Windy City is now famous for urban gardening, green building and solar power, among others. The city’s Center for Green Technology produces more than 70 kilowatts of solar power with three different systems.
- Houston (Sugar Land, Baytown) – GreenHoustonTX.org is headquarters for all things green in Houston. Among other steps, Houston’s Residential Energy Efficiency Program (REEP) has retrofitted 7,000 homes since 2006, and the city is working to improve air quality and address Brownfields.
The city also signed a 5-year contract with Reliant Energy to buy up to 80 MW of renewable power. Municipal buildings requiring more than 10,000 square feet must be built to LEED certifications, which included eight LEED buildings as of April 2009. Specific solar incentives are hard to find in Texas and Houston. In the spring of 2008, there were only about 30 homes with solar power in Houston, and yet Houston is now a Solar America City. Albeit one that dumped nearly 89 million pounds of toxic chemicals in a single year.
- Philadelphia (Camden, Wilmington) – Philadelphia is a destination for commuters from Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. There is no shortage of emissions and toxic chemicals in the City of Brotherly Love. Yet Philadelphia is also a Solar America City, working in close relationship with the Department of Energy to advance solar technologies. They are attempting to implement a plan that would put fruit trees on every corner of the city.
Most Polluted Cities
All toxic chemicals aside, a recent study completed by the American Lung Association examines air quality in detail. The report breaks it down into three categories: short-term particle pollution, year-round particle pollution and ozone pollution. The results are noticeably different than the Forbes report. Pittsburgh and Bakersfield, CA are leaders in particle pollution, while Los Angeles holds the reins on ozone pollution.
- Pittsburgh – In the last few years, Pittsburgh has started to pick up the solar baton. The Steel City was named a 2007 Solar America City, and through the Pittsburgh Solar Initiative, plans to obtain 0.5% of all its electricity needs from solar power. Solar represents just a part of Pittsburgh’s plans to green its city. Still, Pittsburgh residents are breathing some of the most polluted air in the nation, especially in terms of short-term particle pollution, which is caused most commonly by diesel vehicles, steel mills and coal-fired power plants.

- Bakersfield – Bakersfield leads the nation in year-round particle pollution and comes in second behind Los Angeles in ozone pollution. Obviously, Bakersfield has some work to do, and in terms of solar power, this city of roughly 2 million is on its way. For starters, it is home to the United States’ first solar thermal power plant and a biodiesel production plant. Like any city in California, Bakersfield residents have access to some pretty sweet solar incentives. The city of Bakersfield seems to lack government-implemented green incentives, but green industry has had a long home in Bakersfield and Kern County for decades. The Bakersfield area is home to solar, wind, geothermal and biomass plants. Unfortunately, it is also home to plenty of pollution.
- Los Angeles – LA is famous for smog, and apparently no one has taken that unfortunate crown away as of yet. LA continues to lead the nation’s major urban centers in ozone pollution, which is all too visible from the mountains surrounding the area. Still, LA has taken big steps to reduce pollution and increase renewable energy consumption, especially solar power. It may still have the lead, but LA has actually lowered its ozone pollution levels over the last decade. In fact, geography may have more to do with LA’s unwelcome lead in ozone pollution than anything else, as air pollutants need not be generated locally. Solar power is playing a big role in LA’s plans to clean up its skies, including a comprehensive plan by the city’s mayor that would see more than a thousand megawatts of solar generated in LA by 2020.
For a full list of America’s most polluted cities, and to find out how the breathing is in your town, see the 2009 State of the Air report.
Air pollution is obviously a complex problem, where power plants, cars, trucks, sunshine, mountains and wind all play a role. There is no more accomplished world traveler than a particulate on the wind. The fact that cities widely acknowledged as our most sustainable cities can end up on a list of our most polluted cities clearly illustrates the complexity of the problem.
Still, there is plenty of positivity to be culled from the previous rankings. Primarily that at some level, every major city in America, most of which were polluting without regard just 10 to 20 years ago, are now actively taking steps toward a sustainable future – many with solar power at the helm.
Photo Credits: Hunter College, World Business Chicago, NASA, NOAA, & SOS Arsenic