Quantcast

Nuclear Power – An Alternative to Fossil Fuels



Nuclear Energy could be the next big thing to fossil fuels. According to scientists nuclear fission reaction produces massive quantities of power and if this power is harnessed well, it could mean a new dimension to energy. Nuclear plants have been built worldwide with the concept of harnessing nuclear energy for the use of military purposes as well as for other national uses. But an international consent to have nuclear power to replace fossil fuels has yet to reach the stage of development. As now there are six states in the US that have electrical energy through nuclear plants.

A small nuclear plan may generate an electrical limit of 80% which means that a single small plant equals 80% of the fossil power used to generate energy. And the other factor that supports nuclear power is its very limited waste material, which though is not a very good sign. Nuclear wastes are high radio active gases that could mean potential danger, even if it is in a small and limited amount.

Nuclear energy though strong and powerful is yet dangerous and unpredictable. After the horrendous Ukraine nuclear power plant tragedy which has left tens of thousands of people affected 20 years down the lane, harnessing nuclear energy is being given a second thought. Any minor mistake or accident could cause a major disaster, as radio active material tends to stay in the ground actively for thousands of years, and they also maintain their deadliness.

If nuclear power is to be taken as an alternative then the wastes produced must be sealed and permanently stored. Scientists are positive about this as they are convinced that contained nuclear wastes do not pose a hazardous risk and as compared to the daily release of carbon monoxide in the atmosphere, there is no risk in this waste.

With the advance in time latest technologies are being developed to contain nuclear energy wastes as well as harness energy for effective use. Though environmentalists are still skeptic about utilizing nuclear power, scientists are very confirmed of the success of this power replacing fossil power. The only reason for accidents is neglect and lack of seriousness. If these problems could be resolved effectively, then it is assumed that the world could be running on nuclear plants next. As it there are 33 nuclear plants around the world with 430 nuclear reactors. It is just hoped that history would never repeat itself in the case of nuclear power.

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark

New Bill Would Create 10 Million Solar Roofs In 10 Years



Bernie Sanders of Vermont introduced an exciting new bill to Congress last week. The bill defines a plan to install 10 million solar roofs and 200,000 solar water heaters over the next 10 years through tax rebates and incentives. According to the bill, the installations would equal 30 GW of clean energy or the equivalent of 30 nuclear power plants.solar roof

The act, which is being called the “10 Million Solar Roofs and 10 Million Gallons of Solar Hot Water Act” would be an addition to the success of other state incentive programs like those in California and New Jersey.

By providing tax rebates, which will make the cost of new systems almost half, the act would also ensure that the receivers of the incentives also know how to make their buildings as efficient as possible.

According to Sanders, the bill will cost between $2 and $3 billion a year, but with the outcome of 30 GW of renewable energy at the end of 10 years, it’s actually a very cost effective plan.

Moreover, the plan will also create jobs and, as Sanders said, “the more photovoltaic we use, the more will be built; the more that are built, the cheaper it becomes.”

Such programs will help to make our environment better, open up job opportunities, stop the depletion of natural resources, and help us to build a better future for our next generations.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark

Greenpeace Versus Spanish Nuclear Panel



In Madrid the Environmental group Greenpeace said that they taken legal action against the government and the nuclear regulator for unnecessary delays in setting up a panel on nuclear safety with public participation.Spanish Nuclear Panel vs Spanish Nuclear Panel

A statement of Greenpeace mentions that legislation provided for the Nuclear Safety Advisory Committee to be constituted by August 2008 in order to issue non-obligatory recommendations to the Nuclear Safety Council (CSN) watchdog.

The committee will be consist of almost 20 people that will be having the representatives fro central and local government, utilities, unions, environmental groups and technical experts.

Greenpeace spokesman Carlos Bravo stated that having delay over the creation of the Advisory Committee is because the industry minister and the president of the CSN in fact had prevented the environmental groups from getting relevant first-hand information on safety problems.

Greenpeace want more information over a CSN authoritative pronouncement in June that favored allowing the aging Garona nuclear plant to run for another ten years. But according to environmentalists Garona had not implemented some the CSN’s prior recommendations.

The government decided to renew Garona’s operating permit for four years, which drew an appeal from the plant’s operators who want to run it until 2019 at least.

Greenpeace also charges the watchdog for its delayed action over a radioactive leak last year at the Asco I nuclear power station.

In May Asco’s operators were fined 15.4 million euros by the government for breaching safety rules.

Spain is having eight nuclear power plants that provide almost 20% of the country’s electricity and the government has vowed to phase them out in favor of booming renewable energy sources.

Anyhow the Spanish government is not having any plans to close any other nuclear plants in future aside from Garona rest of the plants are having some years to complete their life spans because they were designed for until 2020.

In Spain nuclear power is unpopular that’s why both major parties ruled out building new reactors in elections last year. But the opposition Popular Party has said that they will keep open Garona till 2013 if they got back into power.

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark