Quantcast

Potential for Biomass



United States already generate 45 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity from biomass and that is 1.2% of whole United States electric sales.

Potential for Biomass Energy

United States also produce 4 billion gallons of ethanol, which is almost 2 percent of the liquid fuel used in cars and trucks. Same like that contribution for heat is also considerable. But still it can be produced more by better conversion technology and more attention paid to energy crops.

Estimation about the ultimate potential for the biomass energy differs. Because it depends upon on the agricultural forecasts, waste reduction by industry, and paper recycling. The Department of Energy is sure about producing four percent of transportation fuels from biomass this year and it will be increase to 20% by 2030.

For electricity production United States Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that only crops and crop residues supply will increase 14% for power needs.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark

Even More Recovery Act Funding Rolls Out for Solar Development

The Department of Energy has announced another $12 million in funding for solar technology research and development. The funds will go to four separate projects working intently on solar photovoltaics (PV), with all four working in conjunction with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Colorado. The goal is to facilitate the transfer of cutting-edge [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Biomass Energy’s Environmental Benefits



Biomass energy is having so many benefits for the environment such as reducing air and water pollution, increasing soil fertility and reducing erosion, and improvement of the wildlife habitat.Biomass Environmental Benefits

Carbon Cycle

Carbon cycle is a way of nature for moving carbon around the Earth to support life on it. Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is the most common carbon item in which one carbon atom is bound with two oxygen atoms.

Photosynthesis in the plant’s leaves breaks the carbon dioxide in to two, which keeps the carbon for making carbohydrates, and oxygen is exhaled in the air. So when plant dies or it is harvested for burning then it gives back the carbon to air, and that carbon is absorbed again by plants.

While on other hand fossil fuels are made of plants millions of years ago through organic changes. The carbon, which was absorbed by those plants that time, is being emitted now by fossil fuels burning. As there are no extra plants to absorb that carbon that’s why the cycle becomes out of cycle.

If we look the picture we can see clearly there are two different carbon cycles working one is the natural one between plants and air and perfectly balanced. Second one is human made cycle in which carbon is gained from Earth and emitted into the atmosphere.

Environmental Benefits

As part of the carbon cycle biomass reduces air pollution as shown in the above picture. It reduces carbon dioxide emissions up to 90 percent as compared to fossil fuels. While Sulfur dioxide and other pollutants are also reduced significantly.

It reduces water pollution also as fewer fertilizers and pesticides are used to grow energy crops, and erosion is reduced. Agricultural researchers in Iowa had discovered that planting grass and poplar trees in buffers along waterways can capture the runoff from corn fields and streams will become cleaner.

Food crops extracts the nutrients from the soil while on other hand energy crops improves soil’s quality. Prairie grasses are having deep roots and puts nitrogen and other nutrients in the soil. As Prairie grasses can be replanted every 10 years because of that soil gets minimal plowing that causes soil to erode.

In simple words biomass crops are better for wildlife habitat than the food crops. As they are the native plants so it attracts a variety of birds and mammals. It also improves the habitat for fish by increasing water quality in nearby streams and ponds. Unlike food crops, energy crops are having long time for being harvested and energy crops can be timed to avoid critical nesting or breeding seasons.

All above-mentioned benefits are described in comparison with food crops such as corn, wheat, and soybeans. But comparing with undisturbed natural habitat energy crops is not as good.

But best thing about biomass is that it is much closer to the natural world rather than the modern industrial agriculture.

Harvesting Prairie grasses is not so much different than the fires that sporadically swept across the plains. May be the plantation of poplar and maple trees wont same as varied forests, but are certainly closer than pesticide-laden monocarps.

Anyhow the environmental benefits of the biomass centers on the point that the energy crops will be managed with sustainable agricultural practices. As using chemical inputs increases food crops productivity if it will be done for energy crops then the consequences will be adverse. If biomass energy shows unforeseen environmental effects then it will be better to alter those methods for reducing the effects.

Moral of the Story

Aside from the environmental benefits, biomass energy is also having economic and energy security benefits. For example if we grow our fuels at home then we can reduce the need to import oil and also can reduce our exposure to disruptions in that supply.

Because of biomass energy usage, farmers and rural areas will be having new outlets for their products.

In United States, biomass is already supporting 66,000 jobs and if the dream of the DOE became true then that figure will get three times more.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark

US To Invest Millions In Solar Energy



The US Department of Energy (DOE) has announced plans to invest up to $366million in establishing three new Energy Innovation Hubs, which are described as the ultimate transport solution, finally giving solar fuels the significant financial investment they need.

solar energy

The Hubs will be catering three main areas of solar energy, including developing an effective solar energy to chemical fuel conversion system.

Each hub will be given a fund of almost $122million, over a period of five years. In order to do this, a team of researchers will work together to speed up the scientific discovery to technological development process.

The DOE admits that a lot of work still has to be done, regarding the design of solar fuel generation systems with the required efficiency and sustainability for economic viability.

Basically, a solar fuels system needs to be designed that can operate with greater efficiency and produce fuel with sufficient energy content to enable practical application.

However, there are certain critical issues that still remain unresolved such as:

  • Understanding and designing of catalytic complexes or solids that generate chemical fuel from CO2 and water;
  • Integration of all essential elements from light capture to fuel formation;
  • Evaluation of the solar fuel system under development;
  • Improving energy efficient building systems design;
  • Computer modeling and simulation for the development of advanced nuclear reactors.

It is expected that the DOE will provide $22million during the first year for the establishment of each Hub, and give $25million per year for each of the following four years to support operations.

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark

DoE Finalizes $535M Loan Guarantee For Solyndra PV Panel-Maker



Last week it has been announced by The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE)  that it had finalized a $535 million loan guarantee for California’s Solyndra, who are makers of cylindrical solar photovoltaic (PV) panels.

Solar Photovoltaic Panels

For the announcement at Solyndra’s headquarters, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, and U.S. Vice President Joe Biden were present.

It has been said by the company that it will use the money for the construction of a $733 million solar-panel manufacturing plant about which they have anticipated that it will create 3,000 construction jobs and employ 1,000 Bay Area workers once it begins operations.

It is expected  that from the first phase the annual production of solar panels to provide energy will be equivalent to powering 24,000 homes a year or over 500,000 homes over the project’s lifetime.

Under the Recovery Act and Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Solyndra is the first recipient of a loan guarantee. In addition to this, the loan guarantee that has been issued to Solyndra is the first that is issued by the DoE since the 1980s.

People who liked this Post also read

  • Share/Bookmark